ArcologyCentral.net
Welcome
  • Welcome
    • Bienvenidos
  • About Ar/Cosanti
  • You, Us, It, & Me
    • Arcologia Central y Yo
  • Quaderni
  • Pictures
  • Conversations
  • Blog
  • Contact

The Last Place God Made But Forgot To Finish

7/15/2014

2 Comments

 
Picture
The title of this entry is a comment made by one of my neighbors, an 83 year old Brit with a sharp eye and razor tongue. When I showed him some pictures of Arcosanti, his retort was the Britspeak retort I took to title this entry. It's an echo of  criticisms that have, over the years, been levelled at Arcosanti. 

I myself figure it's easy to take pot-shots at a "laboratory" that seems always under construction if you forget that its intention, right from the start, was to be always under construction. 


That intention seems to have slipped out from under the radar partly because the "it's always under construction" piece hasn't been clearly, much less irrevocably incorporated into its banner head. Nor into its own self-image, an omission provoking the confusion of thinking it can be "completed" according to some single, well-conceived, cleverly CAD-drawn plan. 


It may be Fair Enough to think it's possible to build an "urban laboratory" that way; but I think it's not going far out on a limb to see that it can, must and will be done otherwise. That's simply because the notion of "incomplete" doesn't fit any standard conceptions or preconceptions about what architecture is, how architecture proceeds. 


That not-examined ambiguity about 'completion' has led to some unfortunate misunderstandings of Arcosanti. I'll explain what I mean:

Our Japanese neighbors in the Village of New Denver told us, "The house is not finished until you're dead" (variations include: "When the house is finished, you're dead"). Something similar may be said of urban schemata.

Because when you think about: 'When and how is a city "done"? How or when does a city stop evolving and changing?' your answer has to be: 'They don't.' Cities are life in transition. Cities are always in transition. 

In our post-modern age, "the city that never sleeps" (as admen used to say of New York) remains appropriate. It's still heady, a potent description of city life; because it's understood as being true of cities in general. The ever-bubbling vitality of urban life is what makes cities different from "not-cities" in the broad spectrum of human habitats. 

Moreover, the world in/of cyberspace, 24/7/365, seems to impel urban-mindedness in what were once considered remote places on the globe. In fact,"remote" itself is a word that enunciates a notion of vast distance from urban centers. 

If may take effort to appreciate how Arcosanti cannot be less than a work-in-progress. But that effort pays off nicely even if it is a departure from the 'normal' way people seem to think about Arcosanti-as-architecture.  

To examine the project intensively, from as many vantage points as can be found, review and mull over our own experience of it, one must include, in one's deconstructionist examination of it as a form of material culture, its prehistory, going back" to the era before the actual physical construction of it was begun. My own feeling is that deconstruction of its culture is needed, but that evolved out of my contemplation of it, by my recalling Paolo's moving from his ideas for Mesa City into sketching drawings of self-contained 'urban forms' - the arcology drawings which became the stuff of the 'Big Book' City In The Image Of Man and a number of models to accompany the drawings in that book; all of which were the stuff of the Corcoran Gallery show in 1970. 

All those drawings were sketches of his fascination with development of architectural vocabularies of form, architectural forms that were, to his way of seeing, capable of and waiting for elaboration in a grand variety of sites: the ocean; outer space; across canyons and rivers; out on  the desert, including the desert on the Agua Fria, the 800 acres which is now the site of Arcosanti. 

Arcosanti's existing structures - what Paolo liked to call the "Old Town' - gave us one version of his exquisite interpretation of the 'marginal landscape' he chose for Arcosanti. Although an unschooled eye might find that landscape monotonous or even featureless, his having made himself at home in it, his practical appreciation of it, was to our great benefit That effort of his has left us with a grand vision for a compact built environment in which individual pursuits as well as cooperative lifestyles all can flourish.

That said, during his lifetime, general assumptions about "how things get done" in the world of architectural construction were generally met by head-on resistance on Paolo's part. He was not quick to adopt or even adapt the recommendations of others when it came to developing Arcosanti. The historical record, my own experience included, tells us this. Construction slowed down, practically ground to a halt, after several morally and economically devastating events (the "carbecue,' the death of Colly Soleri, the death of Ivan Pintar, three accidents on site resulting in grave personal injury to those who sustained them), and his resistance gelled, his preoccupation with spiritual speculation intensified. 



I'm reminded of a comment made by Frank Lloyd Wright - Bob Rudner put me onto it - that "Soleri would be a very good architect if he weren't so preoccupied with religion." But who can fault a man for pondering the meaning of his personal universe, particularly when it implodes or comes crashing down on him?

Thinking about the nuances of anthropological, philosophic, eco-psychology dilemmas I find snared in a conceptual arcology (aka architectural ecology, which, it must be repeated, is not "ecological architecture"), I got to thinking about a seminar that I was party to, as an undergrad architecture student at UBC, with a group of students whose task it was to work with the Burrard tribe - actually Tsleil-Waututh Nation, a Coast Salish people most easily identified by its Chief, Dan George. The reserve is on Vancouver's North Shore, just east of North Vancouver's 'downtown' and I got to join the architecture seminar after the term had already started, a few weeks into it, at least. 



The group I was joining had produced some fine drawings for waterfront development plans, including a hotel. The drawings all looked quite spiffy - really very grand. But I had no idea and no-one could explain how the group had come to decide that the tribe wanted the elaborate modification of terrain the seminar group had come up with, since they had never met with the tribe. Meetings had been set up at the school but no-one from the tribe had come to the school to talk with the seminar group. 

I spent the night in the architecture school's studio, constructing a not especially beautiful but relatively accurate topographic model of the reserve. Styrofoam green base, twigs for trees, a bunch of little cardboard things for houses: everything on the model movable. Morning came, students were straggling in for the day. Bleary but determined, I headed off campus, glancing at nothing that might distract. No detours. I pointed the nose of my Volvo towards the Lion's Gate Bridge, drove it, me, and the model, plus whatever waiting-for-a-ride recyclage (baby and kids clothes, as it happened) in a bag on the back seat, where it had been waiting for its next lifetime to appear. 

Found the reserve's road, entered heading eastward, asked someone where was the Chief's house, please? Aimee, Chief Dan George's wife, who was Band Secretary, met me cordially at the door. I introduced myself, explained I was one of the students at the UBC architecture school who'd responded to the Band's request. 



She was gentleness personified. I excused myself to go out to the Volvo, brought back the model to show it to her. I lifted up one of the little cardboard things to explain how all the stuff on the model was movable, anything could go anywhere. I asked here could she please tell me, What they were hoping to see happen? 

To which she responded immediately, her voice a bit alarmed, Oh no, she said, gesturing. We just want to close the lower road so our kids can play safely when people are driving to the shipyard (located past the most eastern side of the Reserve) to go to work!

Oh, I see! I said. You want us to help you deal with City Hall, right? Yes, she agreed, that is what they had hoped. Great, I said.  

Let me report back to the school, see if there is anything we can do. After which, we talked on about kids, about stuff, and I went back out to the Volvo, fetched up the bag of kid and baby clothes that Sonja Arntzen had given me, handed all those garments over, happily and hopefully, into their next life. I hope they were of benefit, because the denouement was less than sensational. 


I left architecture school. I worked for an architect in Seattle for a while, but the adventure itself was a useful lesson in "Do not take what might look obvious for granted." 


Which leads back to where this written exercise started: the assumption that Arcosanti as a "laboratory" is to be 'completed' as a project according to a single neat set of once-upon-a-time designed plans. 


I'm having trouble with that because I do not see that as how cities evolve. Nor do I see that as how an innovative "urban laboratory" gets to perform.

It seems to me that when any structure is completely built, the next evolutionary step is towards its death. A thing subject to organic growth and decay must cycle and recycle. 



That is the nature of all creation, including human creations. What, in human experience, is not subject to change, to growth and decay, to regrowth, blossoming, and then death? 


Without decay, how can growth take place? Isn't that what "organic" is all about?
Flag Counter
2 Comments
Porter Smith
7/16/2014 02:05:33 pm

I've never heard of this, that it's Arcosanti's intention "to be always under construction". I lived there for a few years about a decade ago, and never came across any declaration of the kind, nor heard anyone say that this was the intention, so this surprises me. I remember that Paolo changed the design plan several times... I don't know if he believed that Arcosanti would realize a stage of "final" completion or not. Of course cities are and should be subject to growth and decay cycles -- they are, in my mind anyway, something akin to living organisms. But many, if not most, of Soleri's different arcology designs seemed to be obviously presenting the idea of a "completed" city, or village-structure.. especially those which used the idea of a single monolithic building as the structural space housing the entirety of this city, town or village. Granted, once the arcology-structure is completed, change can occur within the structure without damaging its aesthetic or functional wholeness. An arcology could have a basically fixed, completed framework, within which the cycles of growth and decay continue to happen.

I could easily be wrong here; I would love to see some convincing evidence that Paolo Soleri intended Arcosanti to be in a state of constant construction. Otherwise I'm going to think this is a cop-out. I am still disappointed that construction has gone forward so slowly; I still believe that the arcology is a valuable concept which has hopefully not yet reached its time.

Then again... the massive, monolithic visions of arcologies may just ultimately prove to be fiscally unrealistic, without some kind of vast pooling of funds, which would probably require a massive increase in public awareness and caring, among other things. (I'm not into the idea of big corporate or government backing of arcologies, and it seems beside the point anyway, as apparently large corporations/governments aren't into the idea either.) So maybe Soleri's giant arcological models of aesthetic simplicity and perfection aren't really where it's at, and the real arcology should be more like Arcosanti. More like a tree, maybe -- very slowly growing, potentially to formidable age, strength, and beauty -- with no particular plan set in stone, just a pattern of creative aesthetic function, perpetuating itself through the love and care of its inhabitants.

Reply
Ruth Claire Weintraub
8/27/2016 07:52:17 am

No doubt Paolo hoped to see it built. But he insisted on calling it a 'construction site' rather than encourages its development as a community, Porter. Construction sites don't build themselves. With no plan for its realization other than a professionally unsupervised construction workshop program, how can it be "finished"?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010

    Picture

    Categories

    All
    Title

    Picture
Photos used under Creative Commons from FaceMePLS, nedrichards, qtschlepper, M_Schimmel, fihu, Abulic Monkey, Space][rucker, David Jones, --Sam--, saamiblog, hr.icio, robertkillmer, Vanderelbe.de, runran, Melody Ayres-Griffiths, BiblioArchives / LibraryArchives, LoopZilla, Space][rucker, Cambridge Cat, Tomás Fano, Jonathan Lumibao, srqpix, exfordy, a minha menina, Piano Piano!, loufi, Gwydion M. Williams, TheeErin, Jo Naylor, Ben Sutherland, ratanx, Rome Cabs, tara marie, Joe Shlabotnik, Chrissy Olson, Mavroudis Kostas, postal67, Ryan Dickey, Amanda Niekamp, Paulimus J - moved to: ipernity.com/home/paulj, qtschlepper, qtschlepper, Arria Belli, gedankenstuecke, qtschlepper, Wolfgang Staudt, exfordy, OakleyOriginals, bixentro, 드림포유, RileyOne, kuhnmi